Legal Opinion

Matheson Drilling, Inc. v. Padova

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2000No. 99-203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Matheson Drilling, Inc. appeals from the district court's order granting it a limited judgment against Appellees Alfred Padova (Alfred) and Mary Padova (Mary).

We affirm.

ISSUES

Matheson Drilling presents the following issues for our review:

A. Whether there was sufficient evidence presented to the court to support the finding that Matheson was negligent?

B. Whether the court properly assessed the amount owing to Matheson for the services provided to the Padovas?

C. Whether the court should ... have awarded attorney fees to Matheson?

FACTS

Alfred and Mary were purchasing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cline v. SawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Springer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Adobe Oil & Gas Corp. v. Getter Trucking, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Clark v. GaleWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. R.O. Corp. v. John H. Bell Iron Mountain Ranch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Three Way, Inc. v. Burton Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Alpine Climate Control, Inc. v. DJ's, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Shetka v. Epp Contracting, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. GarnenezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API