Legal Opinion

GBM Communications, Inc. v. United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 18, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SANDERS, Judge.

The pivotal question on this appeal is whether or not the published tariffs of the telephone company are controlling in the services it furnishes to its customers.

The defendant-appellant, United Inter-Mountain Telephone Company [United], is a public utility engaged in furnishing telephone service in East Tennessee and Southwest Virginia. It also acts as the local agent of American Telephone and Telegraph Company [AT & T] in furnishing long distance services throughout the United States and foreign countries.

The plaintiff-appellee, GBM Communications, Inc. d/b/a Access US…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Home Telephone Co. v. People's Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Yealock v. YealockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. McCollum v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. City Messenger Service of Hollywood, Inc., Dba City Messenger Air Express And/or C.M.A.X. v. Capitol Records Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. State v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tennessee Cable Television Ass'n v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Office of the Attorney General, Consumer Advocate And Protection Division v. Tennessee Regulatory AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  3. Tennessee Cable Television Ass'n v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API