City Messenger Service of Hollywood, Inc., Dba City Messenger Air Express And/or C.M.A.X. v. Capitol Records Distributing Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of dismissal by the District Court. The facts are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of District Judge Timothy Hogan, 327 F.Supp. 970, S.D.Ohio, 1971. The parties will be described as in the District Court.
Briefly, the facts are as follows: The plaintiff is an “air carrier” within the meaning of Title 49 U.S.C. § 1301(3), and as such was required to charge the freight rate “specified in its currently effective tariffs.” 49 U.S.C. § 1373(b). More than 3700 shipments were made during the period involved, which began in February, 1955 and ended in January,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Associated Air Transport, Inc., Associated Air Transport, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Louisville & N. R. v. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- American Ry. Express Co. v. American Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- City Messenger Service of Hollywood, Inc. v. Capitol Records Distributing Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1970
3Cited by8 opinions
- Illinois Central Gulf Railroad v. Sankey Bros.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Lamore v. Inland Division of General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Globalcom, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- GBM Communications, Inc. v. United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Anton Toutov v. Curative Labs Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.