McCollum v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKiNNey
The bill, which was filed in December, 1930', charges that defendant is the exclusive operator of a telephone system in the City of Chattanooga, and that for some years complainant has subscribed for and used one of defendant’s telephones, and that the rate charged, and which he has been forced to pay, is unreasonable and unjust. The concluding paragraph of the bill is as follows :
“Complainant avers that the Railroad and Public Utilities Commission of the State of Tennessee, by an order issued on, 'to-wit, November 7, 1928, effective on or about June 1, 1929, fixed and established the present…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Fargo v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- In re Cumberland Power Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Detroit v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Tennessee Cable Television Ass'n v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- State v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Colton v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.