Legal Opinion

State v. Noland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 1984No. 1A83PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant brings forward numerous assignments of error1 relating to the guilt determination phase of his trial and to the sentencing phase of his trial. After a careful consideration of these assignments, as well as the record before us, we find no error in any of these proceedings and affirm the judgments.

Guilt Phase

I

Defendant contends that prior to the guilt-innocence phase of the trial, the trial court erred in “death-qualifying” the jury because a “death-qualified” jury is allegedly prosecution prone, i.e., more likely to convict a defendant, and thus is constitutionally…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. People v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API