Legal Opinion
City of Denton v. Denton Home Ice Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 23, 1930No. 5368PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
The honorable court erred in holding that the business of manufacturing and selling ice is a public utility. Van Valkenburg v. Ford, 207 S. W., 405; Clint v. Home Ice & Brewery Co., 169 S. W., 411; Williams v. Standard Oil Co., Vol. 49, Supreme Reporter, 115; Union Ice Co. v. Ruston, 135 La., 898; State ex rel. Kansas *196City v. O’Rear, 210 S. W., 392; Arts. 1108, 1119, 1302, 1528, Rev. Statutes, 1925.
Royston & Rayzor, by permission of the court, filed briefs in support of the position of appellee.
A municipal corporation, like a private corporation, can exercise only such…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Foster v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1923
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burch v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Lefler v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Zachry v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Gillham v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- City of Waco v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.