Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 7, 2010No. 681, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

Michael Neal and three men robbed Na-vin Patel’s and Soo Kim’s businesses with those owners present. Neal moved for a judgment of acquittal of robbery, with respect to Patel and Kim, on the basis that Patel and Kim were not robbed. Because the robbers intimidated those owners dur ing the theft, by instructing Patel to get down, and displaying a firearm to Kim, we conclude that the trial judge correctly denied Neal’s motion and AFFIRM the judgment of conviction.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On December 31, 2008, Neal, Robert Brown, Kevin Berry, and Kadeem Reams set out on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  2. Delaware Bay Surgical Services, P.A. v. SwierSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. State v. BridgersSuperior Court of Delaware · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Damiani-Melendez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024
  3. Downs v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  4. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  5. Yelardy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API