Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Supreme Ruler of the Fraternal Mystic Circle

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1909PublishedCited by 20 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court.

Tbe defendant is a corporation duly organized under tbe laws of tbe State of Pennsylvania, with its principal office in tbe city of Philadelphia, in that State, and with subordinate lodges, or agencies, located in different States of the Union. Tbe corporation is social and benevolent in character; its object, as indicated in its charter, being “to unite fraternally white persons of proper age and good social and moral character . . . for beneficial and protective purposes, collecting dues and assessments from its members, to provide for tbe payment to its…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bloomington Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BlueIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Railroad v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Story v. Williamsburgh Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Smith v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Marquet v. Aetna Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Cummings v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  3. Loftis v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  4. E. E. Taenzer & Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  5. Wurzburg v. New York Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API