Legal Opinion

Wurzburg v. New York Life Ins.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1918PublishedCited by 17 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. — F. H. Heiskell, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice GreeN

This case presents a controversy between the administrator of Seymour Wurzburg, deceased, and the Specialty Manufacturing Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Tennessee, over the proceeds of a policy of insurance issued on the life of Wurzburg.

The insurance company was made a defendant to the suit, and has paid into court the amount due on the policy.

It appears from the bill of the administrator that, the deceased, Seymour Wurzburg, was the general manager of the Specialty Manufacturihg Company, “and in truth and in fact largely carried on the business and managed the same and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Marquet v. Aetna Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Snyder v. Supreme Ruler of the Fraternal Mystic CircleTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Lane v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. West End Sav. Bank v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Sanders v. Forcum-Lannom, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  5. McMullen v. St. Lucie County BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API