Legal Opinion

Kendall Co. v. Tetley Tea Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 18, 1948No. Civil Action No. 6984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

There are two motions under consideration, Plaintiff moves to amend certain answers to interrogatories, while defendant moves for discovery and production.

The plaintiff brings this action alleging infringement of its Patent No. 2,277,050, covering tea bags and other infusers. Its complaint does not specify which particular claims of the patent are to be put in issue. The defendant’s answer denies infringement, and further asserts invalidity of all claims of the patent. The defendant by interrogatories has asked for a statement specifying'which claims plaintiff elects to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Edward Katzinger Co. v. Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Trico Products Corporation v. Anderson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  4. Lackner Co. v. Quehl Sign Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shell Development Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stark v. Allis-ChalmersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API