Legal Opinion

Lackner Co. v. Quehl Sign Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1944No. 9657PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves the right of a defendant in a patent infringement suit who has filed a counterclaim attacking the validity of the patent, to have that question determined after the plaintiffs have moved to dismiss the suit with prejudice and have offered to grant the defendant a free license.

The bill of complaint charged the infringement of Fensom and Green Patent 1,- 850,319, granted to the Claude Neon Electrical Products Corporation, Ltd., under which the plaintiff the Lackner Company, Inc., is a licensee for a number) of states. The answer denied infringement,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Kendall v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  5. Aero Spark Plug Co. v. BG CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  2. C. Van Der Lely N v. v. F.lli Maschio S.N.C.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  3. Lear Automotive Dearborn, Inc. v. Johnson Controls, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  4. Kawneer Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
  5. Oswego Falls Corp. v. American Seal-Kap Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API