Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Volkswagenwerk AG
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 1, 1991No. 90-5082PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C. (H & R) appeals from an inter*1370locutory order of the district court denying a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment filed by itself and defendant Volkswagenwerk AG (VWAG). See V R. doc. 199 (Amended Order filed Apr. 25, 1990). Normally, our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 extends only to final orders. Appellant H & R correctly maintains that we have jurisdiction based on the collateral order doctrine as applied to a denial of absolute immunity. See Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 742-43, 102 S.Ct. 2690, 2697,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Miller v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Cousin v. SmallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Miller v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Moore v. City of WynnewoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.