Legal Opinion

Lopes v. City of Peabody

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 30, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a Land Court judge’s denial of the plaintiff’s post-judgment motion for the assessment of costs — $21,485.08 expended by the plaintiff in prosecuting against the defendant, the city of Peabody, a regulatory takings claim under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and art. 10 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. We granted the plaintiff’s application for direct appellate review. The Land Court’s judgment in this case was entered on March 31, 1995, after our order of remand in Lopes v. Peabody, 417 Mass. 299 (1994).2 On April 7, 1995, approximately…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Liquor Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Hermitage InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Bernier v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Lopes v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Carver v. WaldmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Holder v. Gilbane Building Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Minkina v. FranklMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  2. Lopes v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Connolly Accuchem Corp. v. Eclectic Foods, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Burgos v. Pilgrim InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API