Legal Opinion
Minkina v. Frankl
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 15, 2014No. AC 13-P-1480PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.
Nataly Minkina contends that her former counsel, Laurie A. Frankl, Jonathan J. Margolis, and Rodgers, Powers and Schwartz, LLP (hereinafter, collectively, RPS), committed legal malpractice during their representation of her in an employment discrimination action. More particularly, she claims that RPS mishandled its opposition to a motion to compel arbitration by failing to recognize that the reasoning in a then-controlling decision of this court, Mugnano-Bornstein v. Crowell, 42 Mass. App. Ct. 347 (1997) (Mugnano-Bornstein), would be rejected by the Supreme Judicial Court in a later…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Liquor Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Hermitage InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Mathis v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Drywall Systems, Inc. v. ZVI Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Van Brode Group, Inc. v. Bowditch & DeweyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- State v. RoatSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Prestige Imports, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Barron v. DipianoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Jarret McGilloway and Linda Estrella, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Safety Insurance Company / Adam Ercolini, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. the Commerce Insurance CompanyMassachusetts Superior Court · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.