Legal Opinion

Norris

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 11, 1977No. 155-77PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"This eminent domain case comes before the court, without oral argument, on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiff brings suit both in the capacity of administrator1 of his late father’s (decedent’s) estate and in *962his own behalf as a beneficiary of the estate under the decedent’s will. He alleges that the decedent was a Yurok Indian, who owned several pieces of real property, which were taken under the Redwood National Park Act, Pub. L. 90-545, 82 Stat. 931 (1968) (codified in 16 U.S.C. §§ 79a-79j (1970)). The Act provided that title to the land would vest in the United States as of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Terteling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Horton Capoeman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  5. Jerome S. Spevack v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Willcox v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  2. Blaine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API