Legal Opinion
Ruf v. Honolulu Police Department
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1999No. 21255PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
LEVINSON, J.
The plaintiffs-appellants Tracy Alicia Ruf, individually and as special adminstratrix of the Estate of Aleisea Kuuipo Tua Lani Mali-ateza Woolsey-Ruf (hereinafter, Aleisea), and Dathaniel T. Woolsey (collectively, the plaintiffs) appeal from the orders of the fifth circuit court (1) denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint and (2) granting the defendants-appellees Honolulu Police Department and the City and County of Honolulu’s (collectively, “the HPD”) motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. 1 On appeal, the…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Hawaii Medical Ass'n v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Mr. & Mrs. Doe Parents No. 1 v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Sorge v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.