Legal Opinion

United States v. Warner

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 17, 1991No. ACM 28651PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Three issues challenge us in this case. They involve: (a) pretrial confinement; (b) multiplicity vis-a-vis serial larcenies; (c) and guidance in the staff judge advocate’s recommendation.

Airman Basic Warner wrongfully borrowed a master key to the rooms of his dormitory. He then embarked on a series of unlawful entries and larcenies. In accordance with his pleas1, he was found guilty at a general court-martial bench trial. His approved sentence is a bad conduct discharge, 18 months confinement, and total forfeitures.

When the case first reached us, we…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. PalmiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. MasseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. CoulterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. HeardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. LloydUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  2. United States v. AlbrechtU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API