Legal Opinion

Ladow v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

The plaintiff in error, for convenience hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was indicted by the grand jury of Richland county upon the charge of perjury, tried to a petit jury, convicted and sentenced. The defendant is here on error proceedings to reverse that judgment for many alleged errors which occurred in the trial of the case, which he claims were prejudicial to him, and prevented him from having a fair and impartial trial. The bill of exceptions is very long, and contains a great many exhibits, and we have examined the same with much care. The principal facts are substantially…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raymond v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  2. State v. De MariasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Matko v. DaleyArizona Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joachim v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. FecteauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Joachim v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Joachim v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. in Re 8650 Frisco, LLC D/B/A Estilo Gaucho Brazilian Steakhouse, Mandona, LLC, Galovelho, LLC, Bahtche, LLC, Claudio Nunes and David Jeiel Rodrigues, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API