Legal Opinion · Dissent

Joachim v. Chambers

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1991No. C-9115Published

1DissentGonzalez, Justice

The primary issue presented here is whether a retired judge who sits only by assignment may testify as an expert witness concerning court procedures in a case in which he is not sitting. The court answers this question in the negative. The court holds that: Canon 2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct prohibits defendants from calling a judge as an expert witness; allowing Judge Blanton to testify would cause further injury to the relators’ counsel's relationship with Judge Blanton; and the appearance of impropriety and partiality cannot be remedied by appeal.

While there is much in the court’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API