Legal Opinion
Ferro v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 5, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, members of Lodge 2053 of the defendant, Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, and former employees of the defendant Railway Express Agency, Inc., have brought this action alleging that they were wrongfully laid off as a result of a contract violation on the part of both defendants and “hostile discrimination” on the part of the Brotherhood. Plaintiffs request relief in the form of an order directing their reinstatement with back pay and requiring the Brotherhood to process their grievance. In the alternative, plaintiffs request damages for wrongful…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dominguez v. National Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Long Island City Lodge 2147 of Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- John Ferro, Harry Lauda and Jerome J. Gagliano, on Behalf of Themselves, and All Those Similarly Situated v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Dominguez v. National Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Ferro v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.