Legal Opinion

North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Haywood County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 2006No. 628PA04PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

In this land condemnation case, we must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion when it allowed plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict as to defendant’s purported expert testimony regard ing certain elements of damage related to the value of the real property at issue. Because we conclude that the trial court reasonably determined that the testimony lacked sufficient reliability, we find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals holding to the contrary.

Plaintiff Department of Transportation made plans to widen U.S. Highway Business…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Gonzalez Et Vir v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crocker v. RoethlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. United Community Bank (Georgia) v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  5. City of Charlotte v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API