Legal Opinion

Nelson v. District Court in and for Second Jud. Dist.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 29, 1974No. 26596PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

Jean Nelson, in this original proceeding, seeks relief in the nature of mandamus and prohibition. She alleges (1) that the trial court continued a hearing on her petition for habeas corpus and denied her the statutory right to a hearing within five days, and (2) that the trial court lacks jurisdiction to hear a petition for permanent custody and should be prohibited from determining the custody issue. We grant relief in the nature of mandamus, but deny the writ of prohibition. The rule to show cause is made absolute in part and discharged in part.

I

Denise and Richard Schweitzer were married in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. District Court in & for City & Co. of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Hawkins v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. New York Foundling Hospital v. GattiSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Kennedy v. CarmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Fahrenbruch v. People Ex Rel. TaberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fry v. BallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. Barden v. BlauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Marcrum v. Marion County Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Brauch v. ShawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. Green v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API