Legal Opinion

Fry v. Ball

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 29, 1975No. 26971PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kelley

Petitioners, the natural parents of the minor child, Scott Tracy Fry, instituted this original proceeding seeking to enjoin respondent from exercising jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act. Section 14-13-101, et. seq., C.R.S 1973. A rule to show cause issued and we now make the rule absolute.

On November 14, 1972, Gwendolyn L. Fry, Scott’s paternal grandmother, was appointed his guardian by the Superior Court of Orange County, California. The petitioners consented to the appointment, because the father was in a California jail awaiting extradition to Oregon on charges…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ferreira v. FerreiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Wheeler v. District Court in & for City & Co. of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. Nelson v. District Court in and for Second Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  4. In Re Custody of ThomasColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. In Re Custody of GlassColorado Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Petition of EdilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Clark v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Clark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. Owens, by and Through, Mosley v. HuffmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API