Legal Opinion

Earhart v. Valerius

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided December 1, 1938No. 2987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Heretofore a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition in the above cause was sustained. When that was done plaintiff asked leave to file an amended petition. This was informally granted. The defendant now moves to strike out the amended pleading on the grounds that the order dismissing the original petition is an adjudication in his favor.

Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provides for amendments as follows: “A party may amend his pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served * * *.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Company v. Wills, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Federal Contracting CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Stewart v. PlattSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Bank of Malden v. Wayne Heading Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  2. United States v. Newbury Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  3. In the Matter of Dennis Mitchell Industries, Inc., Debtor. A. J. Armstrong Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. Joy Manufacturing Co. v. BrooksDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1963
  5. Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood CountyDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API