Inman v. Ken Hyatt Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice:
Respondent Inman commenced this action against appellant Ken Hyatt Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. (Dealer) for fraud and a violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act, S. C. Code Ann. § 39-5-20 (1985) (UTPA). The jury returned a verdict for Inman for $2,500 actual damages plus $100,000 punitive damages for fraud 1 and $2,500 actual damages for the UTPA violation. The trial judge doubled the UTPA award and allowed $4,000 attorney’s fees as permitted by § 39-5-140(a). We reverse in part and affirm in part.
Inman bought a 1986 Chrysler Fifth Avenue from Dealer for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Federal Trade Commission v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
- State Ex Rel. McLeod v. C & L CORP. INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- State v. LivingstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ardis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Ward v. Dick Dyer and Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Potomac Leasing Co. v. BoneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Dowd v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.