Legal Opinion

Inman v. Ken Hyatt Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 11, 1988No. 22817PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Respondent Inman commenced this action against appellant Ken Hyatt Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. (Dealer) for fraud and a violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act, S. C. Code Ann. § 39-5-20 (1985) (UTPA). The jury returned a verdict for Inman for $2,500 actual damages plus $100,000 punitive damages for fraud 1 and $2,500 actual damages for the UTPA violation. The trial judge doubled the UTPA award and allowed $4,000 attorney’s fees as permitted by § 39-5-140(a). We reverse in part and affirm in part.

Inman bought a 1986 Chrysler Fifth Avenue from Dealer for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
  4. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. C & L CORP. INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. LivingstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ardis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Ward v. Dick Dyer and Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Potomac Leasing Co. v. BoneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Dowd v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API