Legal Opinion
United States v. Esposito
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 3, 1992No. 1479, Docket 91-6322PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
Claimants Frank and Klare Esposito appeal from interlocutory orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Thomas C. Platt, Jr., Chief Judge, permitting the United States, the plaintiff in this civil forfeiture action, to sell their home immediately, prior to the resolution of the forfeiture action. On appeal, claimants contend that the record before the district court did not justify an interlocutory sale, especially at the $675,-000 price to be accepted by the government. The government moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. $38,000.00 in United States Currency, David English and Michael William English, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wabtec Corp. v. Faiveley Transport Malmo ABCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Discon, Inc. v. NYNEX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Section 17 Township 23 North, Range 22 East of the IBMCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. EspositoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Allen v. Country Wide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.