Legal Opinion
United States v. Esposito
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 3, 1992No. 1479PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
970 F.2d 1156
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Frank ESPOSITO, Klare Esposito, Claimants-Appellants,
8 Princess Court, Certain Real Property and Premises Known
as No. 8 Princess Court, Holmdel, New Jersey,
etc., Defendants.
No. 1479, Docket 91-6322.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued May 19, 1992.
Decided Aug. 3, 1992.
Arthur P. Hui, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Andrew J. Maloney, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Robert L. Begleiter, Deborah B. Zwany, Sarah J. Lum, Asst. U.S. Attys., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Michael S. Davis, New York City (Michael Rosen, on the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, Banco Cafetero Colon, Defendants-In-Rem-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Michelle's LoungeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Michelle's LoungeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994