Legal Opinion
Vonaa v. Vonaa
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 30, 1988No. 5956PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The state of Connecticut, pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-55 (a), appeals from the trial court’s granting of a motion for modification of a child support order which decreased the support to be paid by the plaintiff. The state claims that the trial court erred: (1) in determining that the support payments originally ordered were made in contemplation of the plaintiff’s obtaining a part-time job; (2) in finding a change in cir*746cumstances of the plaintiff; and (3) in granting the motion for modification without finding a substantial change in circumstances. We find error.
The facts are not in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Grinold v. GrinoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Viglione v. ViglioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Savage v. SavageConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Sardilli v. SardilliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Lanata v. Lanata, No. Fa 98-0718212s (May 25, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Shapiro v. Shapiro, No. Fa85 0222887 S (Apr. 18, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.