Legal Opinion

Sardilli v. Sardilli

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 6, 1988No. 6075PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motions for modification of child support and for contempt, filed approximately one year after the dissolution of the parties’ marriage. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in denying the motion for modification, as a material change of circumstances had arisen since the matter was previously considered, and (2) in denying the motion for contempt, as the plaintiff’s use of the property in question violated the use intended by the parties. We find error in part.

The following facts are relevant to the resolution of this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Nelson v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Benson v. BensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Theonnes v. TheonnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. State v. FranklinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Carro-Kowalcyk v. Kowalcyk, No. Fa96-0155331s (Nov. 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
  4. Fonfara v. Fonfara, No. Fa-97-0716410 (Jul. 29, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  5. Kiniry v. Kiniry, No. Fa98 0163981 S (Oct. 29, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API