Legal Opinion

Hartman Manufacturing Co. v. Luse

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 22, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Van Burén District Court. — Hon. M. A. Egberts, Judge. Action for the forcible detention of real estate. Trial "<¡o the court, a jury being waived. Judgment in favor of ■defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Bishop, 0. J.

The essential facts are not in dispute, and may be stated as follows: Defendant W. I. Luse was he owner of certain lands in Van Burén county, which-*493were incumbered by mortgage held by one Irish. This mortgage was foreclosed, and the lands sold under special execution November 9, 1901. This plaintiff, a judgment-creditor of said Luse, caused a general execution issued on bis judgment to be levied upon Luse’s “equity of redemption and right of redemption” from said foreclosure sale,, and such “equity of redemption and right of redemption”’ was sold to plaintiff under such execution…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sayre v. Vander VoortSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Community State Bank, Paton v. CottingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. Wellman Savings Bank v. RothCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1988
  4. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HaworthCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987
  5. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HaworthCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API