Legal Opinion

Wellman Savings Bank v. Roth

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided September 28, 1988No. 87-1039PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OXBERGER, Chief Judge.

The defendants, Merton and Virginia Roth, appeal from a district court order appointing a receiver over their farm property and requiring the Roths to pay rent on their homestead to the receiver. The defendants contend that the district court erred in appointing the receiver and requiring rent prior to the conclusion of the bank’s foreclosure action and possible sheriff’s sale. Defendants also assert that the appointment of a receiver prior to the end of the redemption period is contrary to Iowa Code section 628.3.

Our scope of review is de novo. Iowa R.App.P. 4. We give…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sheakley v. MechlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Farmers Trust & Savings Bank v. ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Town of Neola v. ReichartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Paine v. MuellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Hartman Manufacturing Co. v. LuseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Community State Bank, Paton v. CottingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. Holliday v. DEBRUCE GRAIN, INC.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
  3. Sibley State Bank v. Dale W. Braaksma, Danna S. Braaksma, Jesse Dale Braaksma, and Braaksma Grain Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API