Legal Opinion

Community State Bank, Paton v. Cottington

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 16, 1989No. 88-983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This appeal involves postjudgment proceedings in a farm foreclosure. The controversy centers on the receiver’s claimed right to lease the land during the redemption period pursuant to the provisions of a consent decree, even though the mortgagee waived a deficiency judgment. The trial court interpreted the decree in the receiver’s favor and the mortgagors have appealed. We affirm.

In October 1984, appellee Community State Bank filed an action to foreclose mortgages it held on land owned by appellants Merrill and Carolyn Cottington. A receiver was appointed to collect rents and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rinehart v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HeerenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. Sayre v. Vander VoortSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. BollinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  5. Local Bd. of Health, Boone County v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank of Des Moines v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. Presidential Realty Corp. v. Bridgewood Realty InvestorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. Holliday v. DEBRUCE GRAIN, INC.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API