Legal Opinion

Hekla Insurance v. Schroeder

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 29, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. T. A. Moran, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The suing out of a summons is, undoubtedly, the commencement of a suit; but, as was held by the court of errors of New York, in Jackson v. Brooks, 14 Wend. 649, “A writ is not considered as legally sued out until it is delivered to the sheriff, with authority to serve it on the defendant, if he can be found within his bailiwick, or placed in his office, or transmitted to him for the purpose of being served.” Mr. Angelí, in his treatise on Limitations, says: “ The general rule appears to be in this country that, at the time of suing out the writ the action commences; and either when the writ…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Ross v. LutherNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Burdick v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1820
  4. Hancock v. RitchieIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Evans v. GallowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Peck v. German Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. McKee v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. Pollock v. KinmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Collins v. ManvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API