Legal Opinion
Abramson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 18, 1999No. 96-338CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on plaintiffs’ Petition for Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses and Costs, which puts forth as an issue whether plaintiffs, as the prevailing parties, are entitled to recover fees, expenses, and costs associated with the prosecution of this matter under, alternatively, the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (1994), or the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “EAJA”), 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412 (West 1994 & Supp.1999). Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
Plaintiffs, who hold various supervisory positions with the United States Government Printing Office (“GPO”) in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Esther Marcus v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Gavette v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Insight Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Adde v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Sharp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- The Public Interest Legal Foundation v. BoockvarDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023