Legal Opinion

Insight Systems Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 12, 2014No. 1:12-cv-00863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

ALLEGRA, Judge:

Before the court, in these bid protest eases, are motions for attorney’s fees filed by both plaintiffs, and a motion for bid preparation and proposal costs filed by plaintiff Cen-terScope Technologies, Inc. (CenterScope).

I

On December 11, 2012, and December 14, 2012, Insight Systems Corp. (Insight) and CenterScope filed complaints, respectively, in this court. On December 21, 2012, the court consolidated the cases. On April 22, 2013, this court granted plaintiffs’ motions for judgment on the administrative record and denied defendant’s cross-motion. Insight…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. Esther Marcus v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hyperion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Park Properties Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Iap Worldwide Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  4. Mayvin, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  5. Park Properties Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API