Legal Opinion

Ross-Berger Companies, Inc., Successor in Interest to Berger Realty Group, Inc. v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 8, 1989No. 88-2010PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

The Ross-Berger Companies, Inc. (Ross-Berger) instituted this diversity action against The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (Equitable) in order to recover a broker’s commission that it earned by procuring a tenant for a building owned by Equitable. After concluding that the doctrine of collateral estoppel precluded Equitable from relitigating two issues relevant to Ross-Berger’s claim, the district court granted Ross-Berger’s summary judgment motion and awarded Ross-Berger prejudgment interest pursuant to the Illinois prejudgment interest statute.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In the Matter of Paul C. Wildman, Debtors. Appeals of Harris Trust and Savings Bank, Cross-Appellant v. Mitchell Edelson, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. T. J. Starker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Candida Mestayer and Brad Culp v. Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation, and Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Jeary K. Smith v. Navistar International Transportation Corporation, Navistar Financial Corporation and J. Merle Jones & Sons, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Westchester Fire Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. General Star Indemnity Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. 38 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) P 76,482, 38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 173 United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Treat Brothers Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a Maryland Corporation and Blinderman Construction Company, Incorporated, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API