Legal Opinion
T. J. Starker v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1979No. 77-2826PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
T. J. Starker appeals from the dismissal, on stipulated facts, of his tax refund action. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. FACTS
On April 1,1967, T. J. Starker and his son and daughter-in-law, Bruce and Elizabeth Starker, entered into a “land exchange agreement” with Crown Zellerbach Corporation (Crown). The agreement provided that the three Starkers would convey to Crown all their interests in 1,843 acres of timberland in Columbia County, Oregon. In consideration for this transfer, Crown agreed to acquire and deed over to the Starkers other real property in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Morris A. Hicks, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. The Quaker Oats CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Audrey M. Thompson, Florence Ain & Gregory Ain, Dorothy E. Kahan & Robert Kahan, Nana Berman & William Berman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Donald A. Peck Judith W. Peck v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.