Legal Opinion

Murray Tool Supply v. St. Use Crawford County

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 1942No. 4-6673PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG-rieein Smith, C. J.

A corporation designated Arkansas Oil and Mining Company prospected in Crawford county for oil. Another corporation—Murray Tool and Supply Company—is domiciled at Tulsa, Okla.

In an action brought by the prosecuting attorney under authority of §§ 2247 to 2250, it was alleged that the Oklahoma corporation transacted business in this state without having complied with statutory requirements. A penalty of $2,500 was sought. The cause was tried by the circuit judge without a jury. Judgment was for $1,000.

It is undisputed that appellant supplied not less than 1,500 feet of casing for the Crawford…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florsheim Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. LesterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  2. Clark v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Sunny South Lumber Co. v. Neimeyer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  4. Stone v. RiggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. White River Lumber Co. v. Southwestern Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. UPI v. Hernreich, D/B/A Station KZNGSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. Uncle Ben's, Inc. v. CrowellDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1980
  3. Hicks Body Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Ward Body Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  4. Worthen Bank & Trust Co. v. United Underwriters Sales Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. North American Phillips Commercial Electronics Corp. v. Gaytri Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API