Stone v. Riggs
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). It is conceded by counsel for the plaintiffs that the sole question upon this appeal is whether the legal effect of the written agreement entered into between the defendants, and which is copied in onr statement of facts, is such that the ButlerMeMurray Drilling Company, or the members thereof, became associated in business as partners with Alphonzo Riggs and William Pautz.
The general rule is that to constitute a partnership there must be a community of interests inter se, and that the parties should share the profits and losses. A well-known exception to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beebe v. OlentineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Mehaffy v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Hayes-Thomas Grain Co. v. A. F. Wilcox Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sturm v. UlrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Murray Tool Supply v. St. Use Crawford CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Van Bibber v. StrongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Central States Life Insurance Co. v. BarrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Spangler v. Comer Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.