North American Phillips Commercial Electronics Corp. v. Gaytri Corp.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentDarrell Hickman, Justice
I dissent because in my judgment the Wingo Act should not be applied in this case.
The Wingo Act is a statute, penal in nature, that prohibits a foreign corporation from enforcing a contract made in this state. The act cannot apply to interstate transactions for obvious reasons. There is the additional question of whether this appellant was “doing business in the State of Arkansas.”
The appellee called an out-of-state company to initiate this agreement. There is no evidence that the appellant (the company’s predecessor actually) regularly did business in Arkansas, maintained a sales staff here…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hough v. Continental Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- UPI v. Hernreich, D/B/A Station KZNGSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Goode v. Universal Plastics, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Brown Broadcast, Inc. v. Pepper Sound Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Mechanics' Lumber Co. v. Yates American MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.