Rosewood Services, Inc. v. Sunflower Diversified Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellees Rosewood Services, Inc. (“Rosewood”) and Tammy Hammond, Rosewood’s sole shareholder, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of constitutional rights guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Defendants-Appellants Sunflower Diversified Services, Inc. (“Sunflower”), a private nonprofit corporation, and James Johnson, Sunflower’s President, moved for summary judgment arguing that qualified immunity precludes this suit. The District Court held that the Defendants are not entitled to assert qualified immunity because they…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Wyatt v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Richardson v. McKnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Harrison v. AshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Bylin v. BillingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- McBeth v. HimesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Fischer v. Forestwood Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Robbins v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.