Conlin v. Emanuel Lewis Inv. Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Denson, Cooley & Denson, for Appellant. Dudley D. Sales, and Harold H. Maundrell, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from the judgment, entered upon the verdict of a jury, against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiffs.
It appears from the evidence, and is not disputed by defendant, that the defendant entered into a contract in writing with Joseph Williams, whereby defendant agreed to sell to Williams lots 14 and 15 in block L of the Mission Street Land Company; that Emanuel Lewis, the president of the defendant company, took Williams to the property before the contract was signed, and pointed out to him what he supposed were lots 14 and 15, but which were actually lots 11…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Adcock v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Davis v. DriscollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Darcel, Inc. v. City of Manitowoc Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Crowe v. SacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Redo Y Cia v. First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Sherwood v. RossiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Logan v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.