Legal Opinion
Walling v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 14, 1947No. 74Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
331 U.S. 17 (1947)
WALLING, WAGE AND HOUR ADMINISTRATOR,
v.
HALLIBURTON OIL WELL CEMENTING CO.
No. 74.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 7, 10, 1947.
Decided April 14, 1947.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
Morton Liftin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General McGrath, Arnold Raum, William S. Tyson and Joseph M. Stone.
Ben F. Saye and Paul Sandmeyer argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was Gurney E. Newlin. Harry C. Robb entered an appearance for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · VinsonChief Justice Vinson
This case brings here a question as to the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. RosenwasserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.