Legal Opinion
Mineo v. Tancini
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 2, 1988No. 99 E.D. Appeal Docket 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The Court being equally divided, the Order of the Superior Court 349 Pa.Super. 115, 502 A.2d 1300 (1986) is affirmed.
HUTCHINSON, former Justice, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. LARSEN, J., files an opinion in support of affirmance in which FLAHERTY and PAPADAKOS, JJ., join. NIX, C.J., files an opinion in support of reversal in which McDERMOTT and ZAPPALA, JJ., join.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
LARSEN, Justice.
The issue presented for our consideration in this case is whether a pre-trial order which precludes a party from asserting an affirmative…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Mineo v. TanciniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Hull v. TolentinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
4Cited by9 opinions
- Harding v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Bey v. SacksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- City of Philadelphia v. SpencerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Marble v. Fred Hill & SonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Schroeder v. Accelleration Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.