Legal Opinion
Bey v. Sacks
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 14, 2001PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTodd, J.
¶ 1 Fred Sacks, D.D.S. (“Dr.Sacks”) appeals from the judgment entered by the Honorable Norman Ackerman of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas on December 21, 2000 in favor of Appel-lees, Robert and Diane Bey (“the Beys”), following a jury trial. Following our review of the trial record before us, we affirm.
¶ 2 The Beys filed two separate dental malpractice lawsuits against several defendants, including Dr. Sacks, alleging various claims of professional negligence and lack of informed consent, as well as a derivative loss of consortium claim on behalf of Diane Bey. Before trial, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Cooper v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fanning v. DavneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- American Future System, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Eastern PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Com., Dept. of Gen. Serv. v. Min. Prod.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.