Legal Opinion
Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. v. Gordini U.S.A. Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 3, 2012No. Case No. 10-CV-0892 H (WMC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER:(1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING SEIRUS’ '804 AND '690 PATENTS;(2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING TRADE DRESS;(3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN AND UNFAIR COMPETITION CAUSES OF ACTION UNDER THE LAN-HAM ACT AND CALIFORNIA LAW; AND(4) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge.
On December 30, 2011, Defendant Gordini U.S.A. Inc. (“Gordini” or “Defendant”) filed motions for summary judgment regarding Seirus Innovative Accessories,…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- EZ Pedo, Inc. v. Mayclin Dental Studio, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Celgene Corporation v. Hetero Labs LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Sunlighten, Inc. v. Finnmark Designs, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Sunshine Enclosures LLC v. Final Bell CorpDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- TP-Link Systems Inc. v. Shenzhen Cudy Technology CO., LTD.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.