Legal Opinion
TP-Link Systems Inc. v. Shenzhen Cudy Technology CO., LTD.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided May 21, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00057Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 TP-LINK SYSTEMS INC., Case No.2:25-CV-57 JCM (BNW) 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 SHENZHEN CUDY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is plaintiff TP-Link Systems, Inc.’s motion for a preliminary 14 injunction. (ECF No. 6). Defendant Shenzhen Cudy Technology Co., Ltd. (“Cudy”) filed a 15 response (ECF No. 29), to which TP-Link replied (ECF No. 37). For the reasons explained below, 16 the court DENIES the motion to enjoin defendant. 17 Also before the court is Cudy’s unopposed motion to deem…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.