Legal Opinion

Hill v. Warrell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Ejectment; Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Champlin, 0. J.

This is an action of ejectment, brought by George EL Hill against Frank L. Warrell and -James B. Grady to recover the premises described in the plaintiff’s declaration. He claims title in fee. The defendants pleaded the statutory general issue. The case was •.tried before the Honorable Willian E. Grove and a jury. After the testimony was closed, the court took the case from the jury by directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

The plaintiff introduced in evidence conveyances show-' ing a chain of title from the United States to him. He *137also introduced a deed executed by the city of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. West v. BechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Eldenbrady v. City of AlbionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Gratwick, Smith & Fryer Lumber Co. v. Village of OscodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API