Legal Opinion

Gratwick, Smith & Fryer Lumber Co. v. Village of Oscoda

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Iosco. (Simpson, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought to recover the amount of certain taxes paid by the plaintiff to the marshal of the village of Oscoda under protest. The taxes were assessed in the year 1890.

The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of lumber, lath, etc., in the village of Oscoda. The village assessor assessed the plaintiff’s mill at the sum of $110,000, and its personal property at $225,000. The plaintiff, feeling- aggrieved at the assessment, appeared before the board of review, and asked to have the amount reduced, claiming that the amount fixed was largely in excess of the value of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walrath v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Phillips v. Township of New BuffaloMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hill v. WarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tumulty v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Ranney Refrigerator Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Shelden v. Township of MarionMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Matrau v. TompkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Long v. Village of DundeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API