Otto v. Hahn
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.
The appellant, Christopher L. Otto, has appealed from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Court dismissing his petition for disability benefits. The one-judge Workmen’s Compensation Court found that Otto was an exempt farm laborer and was therefore not entitled to benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Upon rehearing by a three-judge panel, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-179 (Reissue 1978), the original order was affirmed and the petition dismissed. The appellant assigns as error the failure to award compensation, the failure to find that farming is a hazardous occupation, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Prendergast v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Distinctive Printing & Packaging Co. v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Baskin v. State Ex Rel. Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Ploen v. Union InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Haney v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Larsen v. D B Feedyards, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.